[labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

[Christopher Raum]

Hi Mac,

I've been a lurker on labnetwork for a while, and I think an offshoot
mailing list to discuss process development would be a great complimentary
resource to the labnetwork. The pool of knowledge here is most impressive
and if people were willing to participate it would be a valuable resource
to all the research and process engineers on the list, not to mention the
up and coming graduate fabheads who need tips and tricks to get started. It
could be an alternative to MEMS-talk at the MEMS Clearinghouse.

-Chris Raum
--
Research Engineer
Experimental Cosmology Group
UC Berkeley


On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 6:55 AM, Mac Hathaway <hathaway at cns.fas.harvard.edu>
wrote:

>  Hey All,
>
> As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust of
> Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation and
> administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow interest), I'm
> guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't ask certain question, out
> of deference to others...
>
> If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list, for
> instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment", where much
> more specific questions can be aired without guilt(!), such as "Has anyone
> seen a difference between 5x9s purity and 98% purity TMA in their ALD
> aluminum oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's fine as it is?  I'm thinking a
> specific process or equipment list might bring in other folks for whom the
> general questions have not been sufficiently relevant to merit their
> attention.
>
> Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...
>
>
> Mac Hathaway
> Harvard CNS
>
> _______________________________________________
> labnetwork mailing list
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140702/c0f95c4d/attachment.html>