[labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

[Tom Reynolds]

Hi Everyone,

 

I also agree with Vicky and Mary's viewpoints.

 

Thanks,  Tom

--------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Reynolds,  Lab Manager

UCSB Nanofabrication Facility

Electrical and Computer Engineering Dept.

Engineering Science Bldg #225, Room 1109E

Santa Barbara, CA 93106

805-893-3918 x215  office

805-451-3979  cell

805-893-3918  fax

reynolds at ece.ucsb.edu

 

From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu]
On Behalf Of Mary Tang
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 10:07 AM
To: Vicky Diadiuk; labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Network
Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

 

Hi all --

I vote with Vicky.  I think it would be hard to separate process,
maintenance, and operations.  Managing operations, even at a very local tool
level, seems to me to require a holistic approach --  if a fabrication
process is having a problem, it may be because of equipment issues or maybe
the way the tool is managed or shared.  I also learn an awful lot from the
discussions because the questions asked are generally things I haven't
thought of before -- or maybe something I've always wanted to know, but
couldn't articulate. So I'm also with Vince, I read most every one that
comes through.  And yes, I've been Duane'd on one or two overly specific
postings which I've learned to redirect to specific individuals...  The
system works.  

Mary




-- 
Mary X. Tang, Ph.D.
Stanford Nanofabrication Facility
Paul G. Allen Bldg 141, Mail Code 4070
Stanford, CA  94305
(650)723-9980
mtang at stanford.edu <mailto:mtang at stanford.edu> 
http://snf.stanford.edu



On 7/3/2014 5:11 AM, Vicky Diadiuk wrote:

HI, 

 I respectfully but COMPLETELY disagree.

MIT (Prof Duane Boning to be precise) has been moderating Labnetwork for
years & it's working beautifully.

The information one gleans (even if one wasn't explicitly interested before
it got asked) is most useful, & participants seem to be pretty relaxed
asking specific questions.

If the thread gets too detailed, it switches seamlessly to a conversation
between the parties.

I don't think we need to make rather artificial process, equipment &
operations distinctions.

 

If ain't broke ...

 

 Happy 4th!

Vicky

 

 

 

On Jul 2, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Bob Henderson wrote:





Mac:

 

I think that is a wonderful idea. As I am more involved in various equipment
and process technologies, it would be a good opportunity to help with more
specific issues regarding advancements and new equipment available for a
variety of nano specific questions and projects. Bob Henderson

 

From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu <mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu>
[mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Mac Hathaway
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 6:56 AM
To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu <mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu> 
Subject: [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

 

Hey All,

As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust of
Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation and
administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow interest), I'm
guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't ask certain question, out
of deference to others...

If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list, for
instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment", where much more
specific questions can be aired without guilt(!), such as "Has anyone seen a
difference between 5x9s purity and 98% purity TMA in their ALD aluminum
oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's fine as it is?  I'm thinking a specific
process or equipment list might bring in other folks for whom the general
questions have not been sufficiently relevant to merit their attention. 

Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...


Mac Hathaway
Harvard CNS

_______________________________________________
labnetwork mailing list
labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu <mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu> 
https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork

 






_______________________________________________
labnetwork mailing list
labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu <mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu> 
https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140703/3b61adb9/attachment.html>