From olms0025 at umn.edu Mon Jul 3 14:56:30 2023 From: olms0025 at umn.edu (Brian K. Olmsted) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 13:56:30 -0500 Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? Message-ID: Hi, We are poised to buy a Heidelberg DWL 66+ but we have been having an abysmal experience with field service from Heidelberg and their lack of urgency / responsiveness has been deleteriously impacting our operations and reputation for over a year now. Before we move forward with adding a new Heidelberg tool I wanted to reach out to the community to ask (1) if anyone uses a 3rd party for field service on Heidelberg direct-write tools that they would recommend, and (2) if there are alternative manufacturers anyone has experience with that they would recommend? Thanks, Brian K. Olmsted Associate Director of Laboratory Operations University of Minnesota | Minnesota Nano Center cse.umn.edu/mnc 612.626.3287 olms0025 at umn.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tobi at stanford.edu Mon Jul 3 16:27:07 2023 From: tobi at stanford.edu (Tobi Beetz) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 20:27:07 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Brian ? I can highly recommend Durham Magneto Optics as we?ve had the exact opposite experience working with them. We bought our first DWL tool from them a few years ago. I was initially skeptical and had urged our staff to consider adding a Heidelberg. We ended up with the Durham and have been absolutely thrilled with their responsiveness and collaboration. The tool has been a huge success with our community, and we added another one last year (365nm and 385nm). Some of our users use the Heidelbergs at SNF and the ML3s at SNSF as they have some complementary features. More info on the tool at https://snsf.stanford.edu/facilities/fab/fcr/ml3 . There is also a section below on the website that has tons of additional info that might be interesting to dig through. Finally, the price of an ML3 is another huge plus ? Cheers, Tobi Tobi Beetz, Ph.D. Associate Director, Stanford Nano Shared Facilities, Stanford University, http://snsf.stanford.edu From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Brian K. Olmsted Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 11:57 AM To: Lab Network (labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu) Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? Hi, We are poised to buy a Heidelberg DWL 66+ but we have been having an abysmal experience with field service from Heidelberg and their lack of urgency / responsiveness has been deleteriously impacting our operations and reputation for over a year now. Before we move forward with adding a new Heidelberg tool I wanted to reach out to the community to ask (1) if anyone uses a 3rd party for field service on Heidelberg direct-write tools that they would recommend, and (2) if there are alternative manufacturers anyone has experience with that they would recommend? Thanks, Brian K. Olmsted Associate Director of Laboratory Operations University of Minnesota | Minnesota Nano Center cse.umn.edu/mnc 612.626.3287 olms0025 at umn.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From carver at stanford.edu Mon Jul 3 17:23:55 2023 From: carver at stanford.edu (Thomas Eugene Carver) Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:23:55 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Brian, Yes, we?ve had great luck with our two ML3 machines. About the only benefit of the larger Heidelbergs have is their speed of writing. The DMO ML3 machines we have are super versatile and do a really nice job of direct writing. We do a lot of work with small chips and even tiny slivers of oddball materials. The ML3 doesn?t have a vacuum chuck, so it can work with any size little chip, but also works on up to 8? square. We have people who work with full wafers too, even though they could write them faster on the Heidelbergs across the street. The ML3 makes much smoother shallow angle lines, curves, circles, etc. We never really see any hint of ?stair-stepping? (pixelization) in the written patterns, like you do on the Heidelbergs. Even a very small ring comes out perfectly round. People doing things like optical waveguides with long gentle curves have great results on the ML3. We also have a lot of people doing things like making molds for micro-fluidic devices, where keeping the sidewalls of the channels as smooth as possible is very important to them. And we have a lot of people working with 2D materials, where it?s important to be able to align an array of contact fingers very carefully to a difficult-to-see flake. The ?virtual aligner? feature makes it easy to verify that the alignment was done perfectly by placing a transparent purple digitally rendered image of the pattern you?re about to write over the microscope image. They?re able to design custom patterns like that right at the machine, and write them, all in one session. We have about 150 people trained on the machines. Both 365nm and 385nm work for general lithography on broadband resists. But the people who work with SU-8 use the 365nm machine because 365nm exposes SU-8 about 20x faster than 385nm (SU-8 is very narrow band and optimized for 365nm). I?m happy to answer any questions you might have about the ML3s. We?ve been really happy with them. And DMO is the best company I have ever dealt with. Even though they?re in England, they answer all my questions promptly and thoroughly. They?ve even taken suggestions I?ve had on improving their software, which they incorporated into their latest software versions to make the machines work even better than when we got our first machine. Their sales and service is technically supposed to be done by Quantum Design out of San Diego. But the machines have been so reliable that the only real service was done remotely by DMO, or done in person by DMO when they were here to install our second machine. If you buy a machine though, you would buy it through Quantum Design (their USA distributor). The only complaints I?ve heard about the DMO machines are that they are a little slow when doing full wafers, and that the software home screen is kind of bland, ?not elegant? as one user put it. Apparently Heidelberg has a fancier looking home screen with nicer graphics. I don?t care about how fancy the home screen is though, as long as it works. And it usually works great. We?ve never had a machine down for more than about a day. We?ve never had any sort of mechanical issues with either machine. It?s always been just small software-related problems, that they were able to either tell us how to fix, or fix it for us remotely using ?TeamViewer? from England while we?re sleeping. The ML3s are pretty sensitive to vibration. If you?re on a second floor of a building like we are, you?ll want to mount the machine as close to a support column as possible. And you?ll definitely need the floating optical bench option. The best bet would be to have it in a basement or ground floor though on solid concrete. The machine will only write if it senses a certain level of stability. If they?re doing a jackhammer downstairs, it will stop writing intermittently. Or if someone leans something that?s jiggling on the floating optical bench it will stop writing. I also had to line the inside of both machines with vibration damping peel-n-stick material to stop the panels from resonating like drum heads due to the rumble from our HEPA filters in the ceiling. DMO saw how well that material worked after I installed it on the insides of our panels, and said they?d probably be installing that on all future machines they make. If you ever need some of that material though, it?s called ?Dynamat Xtreme?. You just cut it to shape with scissors, peel off the backing paper, and use a roller to press it out flat onto the sheet metal panels. It?s a viscoelastic material which absorbs vibrations by converting them to heat. It really works great at keeping sheet metal panels from resonating. Good luck, Tom Thomas Carver Flexible Cleanroom Lab Manager Stanford Nano Shared Facilities carver at stanford.edu On Jul 3, 2023, at 1:27 PM, Tobi Beetz wrote: Hi Brian ? I can highly recommend Durham Magneto Optics as we?ve had the exact opposite experience working with them. We bought our first DWL tool from them a few years ago. I was initially skeptical and had urged our staff to consider adding a Heidelberg. We ended up with the Durham and have been absolutely thrilled with their responsiveness and collaboration. The tool has been a huge success with our community, and we added another one last year (365nm and 385nm). Some of our users use the Heidelbergs at SNF and the ML3s at SNSF as they have some complementary features. More info on the tool athttps://snsf.stanford.edu/facilities/fab/fcr/ml3 . There is also a section below on the website that has tons of additional info that might be interesting to dig through. Finally, the price of an ML3 is another huge plus ? Cheers, Tobi Tobi Beetz, Ph.D. Associate Director, Stanford Nano Shared Facilities, Stanford University, http://snsf.stanford.edu From: labnetwork > On Behalf Of Brian K. Olmsted Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 11:57 AM To: Lab Network (labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu) > Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? Hi, We are poised to buy a Heidelberg DWL 66+ but we have been having an abysmal experience with field service from Heidelberg and their lack of urgency / responsiveness has been deleteriously impacting our operations and reputation for over a year now. Before we move forward with adding a new Heidelberg tool I wanted to reach out to the community to ask (1) if anyone uses a 3rd party for field service on Heidelberg direct-write tools that they would recommend, and (2) if there are alternative manufacturers anyone has experience with that they would recommend? Thanks, Brian K. Olmsted Associate Director of Laboratory Operations University of Minnesota | Minnesota Nano Center cse.umn.edu/mnc 612.626.3287 olms0025 at umn.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Peter.Lomax at ed.ac.uk Tue Jul 4 04:47:49 2023 From: Peter.Lomax at ed.ac.uk (Peter Lomax) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 08:47:49 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Brian, The same here for Durham Magneto Optics ? we have had a really good relationship with them over the last 5 years and the tool has proved very popular and versatile including grey scale litho, back side alignment and we have had the optics and light sources upgraded to improve the feature size. Best Peter From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Tobi Beetz Sent: 03 July 2023 21:27 To: Brian K. Olmsted ; Lab Network (labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu) Cc: Thomas Eugene Carver Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? This email was sent to you by someone outside the University. You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe. Hi Brian ? I can highly recommend Durham Magneto Optics as we?ve had the exact opposite experience working with them. We bought our first DWL tool from them a few years ago. I was initially skeptical and had urged our staff to consider adding a Heidelberg. We ended up with the Durham and have been absolutely thrilled with their responsiveness and collaboration. The tool has been a huge success with our community, and we added another one last year (365nm and 385nm). Some of our users use the Heidelbergs at SNF and the ML3s at SNSF as they have some complementary features. More info on the tool at https://snsf.stanford.edu/facilities/fab/fcr/ml3 . There is also a section below on the website that has tons of additional info that might be interesting to dig through. Finally, the price of an ML3 is another huge plus ? Cheers, Tobi Tobi Beetz, Ph.D. Associate Director, Stanford Nano Shared Facilities, Stanford University, http://snsf.stanford.edu From: labnetwork > On Behalf Of Brian K. Olmsted Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 11:57 AM To: Lab Network (labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu) > Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? Hi, We are poised to buy a Heidelberg DWL 66+ but we have been having an abysmal experience with field service from Heidelberg and their lack of urgency / responsiveness has been deleteriously impacting our operations and reputation for over a year now. Before we move forward with adding a new Heidelberg tool I wanted to reach out to the community to ask (1) if anyone uses a 3rd party for field service on Heidelberg direct-write tools that they would recommend, and (2) if there are alternative manufacturers anyone has experience with that they would recommend? Thanks, Brian K. Olmsted Associate Director of Laboratory Operations University of Minnesota | Minnesota Nano Center cse.umn.edu/mnc 612.626.3287 olms0025 at umn.edu The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th? ann an Oilthigh Dh?n ?ideann, cl?raichte an Alba, ?ireamh cl?raidh SC005336. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sergilendi at lsu.edu Tue Jul 4 09:19:10 2023 From: sergilendi at lsu.edu (Sergi Lendinez) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 13:19:10 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Brian, I can also vouch for DMO. Here at LSU we have an ML3 and we are very happy with it. A very useful feature is that you can switch between lenses during one exposure run, so if alignment is taken care of -which can be done automatically through the software- writing time can be reduced. Backside alignment is also nice. And their customer support is outstanding, which I find really hard to find these days. Regards, Sergi ________________________________ From: labnetwork on behalf of Peter Lomax Sent: Tuesday, July 4, 2023 3:47:49 AM To: Tobi Beetz ; Brian K. Olmsted ; Lab Network (labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu) Cc: Thomas Eugene Carver Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? You don't often get email from peter.lomax at ed.ac.uk. Learn why this is important Hi Brian, The same here for Durham Magneto Optics ? we have had a really good relationship with them over the last 5 years and the tool has proved very popular and versatile including grey scale litho, back side alignment and we have had the optics and light sources upgraded to improve the feature size. Best Peter From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Tobi Beetz Sent: 03 July 2023 21:27 To: Brian K. Olmsted ; Lab Network (labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu) Cc: Thomas Eugene Carver Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? This email was sent to you by someone outside the University. You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe. Hi Brian ? I can highly recommend Durham Magneto Optics as we?ve had the exact opposite experience working with them. We bought our first DWL tool from them a few years ago. I was initially skeptical and had urged our staff to consider adding a Heidelberg. We ended up with the Durham and have been absolutely thrilled with their responsiveness and collaboration. The tool has been a huge success with our community, and we added another one last year (365nm and 385nm). Some of our users use the Heidelbergs at SNF and the ML3s at SNSF as they have some complementary features. More info on the tool at https://snsf.stanford.edu/facilities/fab/fcr/ml3 . There is also a section below on the website that has tons of additional info that might be interesting to dig through. Finally, the price of an ML3 is another huge plus ? Cheers, Tobi Tobi Beetz, Ph.D. Associate Director, Stanford Nano Shared Facilities, Stanford University, http://snsf.stanford.edu From: labnetwork > On Behalf Of Brian K. Olmsted Sent: Monday, July 3, 2023 11:57 AM To: Lab Network (labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu) > Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg alternatives? Hi, We are poised to buy a Heidelberg DWL 66+ but we have been having an abysmal experience with field service from Heidelberg and their lack of urgency / responsiveness has been deleteriously impacting our operations and reputation for over a year now. Before we move forward with adding a new Heidelberg tool I wanted to reach out to the community to ask (1) if anyone uses a 3rd party for field service on Heidelberg direct-write tools that they would recommend, and (2) if there are alternative manufacturers anyone has experience with that they would recommend? Thanks, Brian K. Olmsted Associate Director of Laboratory Operations University of Minnesota | Minnesota Nano Center cse.umn.edu/mnc 612.626.3287 olms0025 at umn.edu The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th? ann an Oilthigh Dh?n ?ideann, cl?raichte an Alba, ?ireamh cl?raidh SC005336. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From beaudoin at physics.ubc.ca Tue Jul 4 17:31:31 2023 From: beaudoin at physics.ubc.ca (Beaudoin, Mario) Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2023 14:31:31 -0700 Subject: [labnetwork] Heidelberg MLA150 SU-8 Exposure Dose In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <54d391c6-cbee-2f77-6b0f-504f7ef7253f@physics.ubc.ca> We experience the same thing with our instrument. Mario On 2023-06-22 10:28 a.m., Hollingshead, Dave wrote: > [*CAUTION:* Non-UBC Email] > > Dear Labnetwork, > > We have found that exposure of SU-8 on our MLA150 tool (using the > 375nm laser) seems to require very high doses. Even thin ~500nm thick > films (using SU-8 2000.5) have required doses on the order of > 1200mJ/cm^2 to fully expose. This is 15-20x the recommended dosage > from both the datasheet and what we estimate is the exposure dose used > on our filtered contact aligners. Thicker films follow the same trend, > but not necessarily in a linear fashion (5?m films require ~2000mJ/cm^2 ). > > I am sure the bump from 365nm to 375nm plays a role, but the magnitude > of the change seems excessive. FWIW, our other negative resists (eg. > nLOF2020) seem to expose properly at reasonable doses. > > Has anyone else experienced this? Does anyone have an explanation or > any processing suggestions for using SU-8 with an MLA? > > Thanks, > > -Dave > > *Dave Hollingshead* > Manager, Research Operations > > *The Ohio State University* > Nanotech West Labs > Suite 100, 1381 Kinnear Rd, Columbus, OH 43212 > 614.292.1355 Office > hollingshead.19 at osu.edu / > nanotech.osu.edu > > Pronouns: he/him/his > > > _______________________________________________ > labnetwork mailing list > labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu > https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Mario Beaudoin SBQMI sig 2.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 21446 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tucsonr at illinois.edu Wed Jul 5 09:37:40 2023 From: tucsonr at illinois.edu (Richelson, Tucson) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 13:37:40 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] No water flow? - AccuThermo AW610M RTP Message-ID: Hello everyone, We have a AW610 RTP and we noticed that the pyrometer coolant water wasn't flowing. We disconnected the chiller bath and tested it separately and confirmed that it was pumping water. Has anyone else experience this? Any suggestions on how to fix this? https://allwin21.com/accuthermo-aw-610/ Best, Tucson Richelson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nick Holonyak, Jr. Micro and Nanotechnology Lab (HMNTL) University of Illinois Rm 2118, MC-249 208 North Wright St. Urbana, IL 61801 Office: +1 (217) 244-5138 Web: http://mntl.illinois.edu/ Schedule training: https://book.ms/b/Training2 at uillinoisedu.onmicrosoft.com Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act any written communication to or from university employees regarding university business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From logshappill at gmail.com Wed Jul 5 12:31:54 2023 From: logshappill at gmail.com (Leslie George) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2023 09:31:54 -0700 Subject: [labnetwork] No water flow? - AccuThermo AW610M RTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7DC3F9D7-3B32-45FD-80EF-2FF066A81B89@gmail.com> Hi Tucson, The cooling lines on these tools are know to gunk up over time. I suspect you?ll need to undo the fittings to check for blockages. ALLWIN has a solid support team that can guide you through the process. Also, I thought the chiller was meant to cool just the door assembly and not the internal components. Forgive me if I?m wrong but it could be that the house cooling loop is what feeds the pyrometer. Good luck! -Leslie > On Jul 5, 2023, at 6:59 AM, Richelson, Tucson wrote: > > ? > Hello everyone, > > We have a AW610 RTP and we noticed that the pyrometer coolant water wasn?t flowing. We disconnected the chiller bath and tested it separately and confirmed that it was pumping water. Has anyone else experience this? Any suggestions on how to fix this? > > https://allwin21.com/accuthermo-aw-610/ > > > Best, > Tucson Richelson > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Nick Holonyak, Jr. Micro and Nanotechnology Lab (HMNTL) > University of Illinois > Rm 2118, MC-249 > 208 North Wright St. Urbana, IL 61801 > Office: +1 (217) 244-5138 > Web: http://mntl.illinois.edu/ > Schedule training: https://book.ms/b/Training2 at uillinoisedu.onmicrosoft.com > Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act any written communication to or from university employees regarding university business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure. > > _______________________________________________ > labnetwork mailing list > labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu > https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tucsonr at illinois.edu Thu Jul 6 10:10:57 2023 From: tucsonr at illinois.edu (Richelson, Tucson) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 14:10:57 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] No water flow? - AccuThermo AW610M RTP In-Reply-To: <7DC3F9D7-3B32-45FD-80EF-2FF066A81B89@gmail.com> References: <7DC3F9D7-3B32-45FD-80EF-2FF066A81B89@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hello Leslie, I blew some N2 through the lines and some milky water came out. It seems to be pumping fine now. If it fails again I?ll try that. I?ve read and re-read the manual. This is still all new to me and I might still be wrong but here?s what I?ve learned so far. There are three cooling systems. One is water (from the house) to cool the oven. One is N2 to cool the quartz isolation tube. And lastly is water (from a chiller bath) to cool the pyrometer. I did reach out to Allwin and they got back to me, so thank you for your good suggestion, and thank you for responding! From: Leslie George Sent: Wednesday, July 5, 2023 11:32 AM To: Richelson, Tucson Cc: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Subject: Re: [labnetwork] No water flow? - AccuThermo AW610M RTP Hi Tucson, The cooling lines on these tools are know to gunk up over time. I suspect you?ll need to undo the fittings to check for blockages. ALLWIN has a solid support team that can guide you through the process. Also, I thought the chiller was meant to cool just the door assembly and not the internal components. Forgive me if I?m wrong but it could be that the house cooling loop is what feeds the pyrometer. Good luck! -Leslie On Jul 5, 2023, at 6:59 AM, Richelson, Tucson > wrote: ? Hello everyone, We have a AW610 RTP and we noticed that the pyrometer coolant water wasn?t flowing. We disconnected the chiller bath and tested it separately and confirmed that it was pumping water. Has anyone else experience this? Any suggestions on how to fix this? https://allwin21.com/accuthermo-aw-610/ Best, Tucson Richelson ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nick Holonyak, Jr. Micro and Nanotechnology Lab (HMNTL) University of Illinois Rm 2118, MC-249 208 North Wright St. Urbana, IL 61801 Office: +1 (217) 244-5138 Web: http://mntl.illinois.edu/ Schedule training: https://book.ms/b/Training2 at uillinoisedu.onmicrosoft.com Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act any written communication to or from university employees regarding university business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure. _______________________________________________ labnetwork mailing list labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From info at fabsurplus.com Thu Jul 6 09:22:10 2023 From: info at fabsurplus.com (Stephen Howe) Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2023 15:22:10 +0200 Subject: [labnetwork] Scammers operating out of New York Message-ID: <1ef8709d0633602539e941da351771d60ead46a1.camel@fabsurplus.com> Dear Lab Network, Hope you are all well. As an FYI, please be aware that there is a gang of internet based fraudsters operating in your area. They are targetting such sectors as Semiconductor, healthcare, machine- tooling and other high tech areas. The way they work is they advertise tools which really exist in the market place, which they don't own. When you send them a payment, they just pocket the money via mule bank accounts and move on. They are able to do this due to they are well protected by banking privacy laws. They have been operating since 2018 in the semiconductor sector. I have advised the FBI repeatedly about many specific criminal activities of this group, but the FBI did not take any actions to my knowledge , hence these individuals continue to operate scam companies and continue to rip off businesses and individuals in the New York , Mid-West and New England area. So, due to this alarming development, before you purchase any used semiconductor equipment or spare parts, it is necessary to check physically the machinery and confirm the ownership before to proceed to purchase it. I attach one news article published in internet about these scammers from 2019 (They continue to operate freely in USA. ). I had to shut down my operations in the USA due to I was defrauded by these people. My opinion is that law enforcement in the USA needs to do something to shut down these people's scam operations, which are damaging the reputation of the New York area across the world. Yours sincerely, SDI Fabsurplus Italia SRL Stephen Howe Company Owner email: info at fabsurplus.com Mobile (Italy) : +39 335-710-7756 WWW.FABSURPLUS.COM Your Marketplace for Used Semiconductor Equipment -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: MDNA_July_30_2019_Briefing.pdf Type: application/pdf Size: 676783 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rrand at ucdavis.edu Thu Jul 6 14:11:22 2023 From: rrand at ucdavis.edu (Ryan R Anderson) Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2023 18:11:22 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] UC Davis Center for Nano-Micro Manufacturing job opening Message-ID: Dear Lab Network community, The Center for Nano-Micro Manufacturing at UC Davis has an open position for a Process/Equipment Engineer. This position primarily oversees equipment and takes care of users in our photolithography and wafer/die bonding process areas with responsibilities extending into other areas of the facility as well. The full job description including responsibilities, required knowledge, skills and experience can be found here. Looking forward to hearing from anyone that might be interested! Thank you Ryan Anderson Manager, Center for Nano-MicroManufacturing 1209 Kemper Hall University of California Davis One Shields Avenue Davis, CA 95616 Phone: 530-601-3943 Email: rrand at ucdavis.edu https://cnm2.ucdavis.edu/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From James.Grant at glasgow.ac.uk Fri Jul 7 10:50:54 2023 From: James.Grant at glasgow.ac.uk (James Grant) Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2023 14:50:54 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] SPTS Rapier Module - Laser/White Light Interferometry In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello, 6 months later, thought it only correct to inform the community that we successfully installed an Intellemetrics LEP system on our Rapier. Many thanks to those who helped us along the way! [cid:image004.png at 01D9B0EA.DED70690] [A screenshot of a graph Description automatically generated with low confidence] Cheers, James Dr. James Paul Grant Research Engineer in Plasma Processing Plasma Processing Group james.grant at glasgow.ac.uk [cid:image001.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] www.JWNC.gla.ac.uk [cid:image002.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] LinkedIn.com/company/JWNC [cid:image003.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] @UofG_JWNC From: James Grant Sent: Sunday, February 19, 2023 10:49 AM To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Subject: RE: SPTS Rapier Module - Laser/White Light Interferometry Hello all, Been almost two weeks since I posted this and believe we have come to some conclusions. Many thanks to all those who contributed. Tyndall and EPFL people were especially helpful. 1. We had a lot of back and forth with SPTS. They said that while they could see benefit of laser interferometry for our application, they currently did not offer the hardware to mount laser interferometry endpoint systems to the Rapier. We asked them to quote to so do, but they were unwilling. Fair enough. 2. I don't think the folks at Tyndall will mind me mentioning the challenges they have faced in getting laser interferometry on their SPTS Synapse module working. I understand the issue is spot stability and wobble, thought to be cased by heat from chamber walls - they Synapse walls are heated to 130oC. It's thought this won't be a problem on the Rapier as chamber walls are only heated to 55oC. Let's hope so. 3. We sent pictures and some dimensions of the pre-drilled holes at the top of our Rapier to Intellemetrics, our preferred laser endpoint system vendor. They believe it possible to mount a LEP 500 unit to the tool with not too much trouble. Hope summary information is useful. Cheers, James Dr. James Paul Grant Research Engineer in Plasma Processing Plasma Etch Group james.grant at glasgow.ac.uk [cid:image001.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] www.JWNC.gla.ac.uk [cid:image002.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] LinkedIn.com/company/JWNC [cid:image003.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] @UofG_JWNC From: James Grant Sent: 06 February 2023 14:38 To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Subject: SPTS Rapier Module - Laser/White Light Interferometry Hello, Hoping the community can feedback on their experiences. In 2019 we purchased an SPTS Rapier DSiE tool. As well as doing Bosch processing we also require the tool to do mixed process etching. Quite a few of our users, on our other Si etch tools (OIPT Estrelas and STS Multiplex), use mixed process to etch SOI materials or a-Si on fused silica substrates. These systems have Intellemetrics LEP 410/500 red laser interferometer units for the purpose of end-point detection. When we purchased the Rapier, SPTS did tell us that a laser end-point system could not be used. They encouraged us instead to use the Claritas OES system on the tool, however when we pointed out our typical use scenario (small substrate size, low % open area) they admitted that the Claritas would struggle to differentiate when to end-point. Our preferred laser interferometer vendor, Intellemetrics, say they have sold LEP 500 red laser interferometer units to SPTS but cannot say on what systems they have been used. We have found that EPFL use white light interferometry end-point detection on their Rapier module - have contacted Phillipe Fluckiger separately. My question to the community is has anyone used a laser interferometry system on an SPTS Rapier? If so, could they feedback with their experiences. Apologies I'm asking such an open question! Cheers, James Dr. James Paul Grant Research Engineer in Plasma Processing Plasma Processing Group james.grant at glasgow.ac.uk [cid:image001.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] www.JWNC.gla.ac.uk [cid:image002.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] LinkedIn.com/company/JWNC [cid:image003.png at 01D9B0EA.797EA8C0] @UofG_JWNC -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 26666 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.png Type: image/png Size: 1538 bytes Desc: image002.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.png Type: image/png Size: 1717 bytes Desc: image003.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image004.png Type: image/png Size: 320184 bytes Desc: image004.png URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image005.png Type: image/png Size: 176529 bytes Desc: image005.png URL: From jonathanr at science.xyz Mon Jul 10 12:40:16 2023 From: jonathanr at science.xyz (Jonathan Reeder) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:40:16 -0700 Subject: [labnetwork] Vendors or contractors that can evap Mg Message-ID: I'm looking to get ~20x 4" wafers coated with Mg and having trouble finding a vendor or academic cleanroom that has a tool that allows high vapor pressure materials like Mg or Zn. Any leads where this could be done? LGA thin films can't do it, and ideally somewhere local to the bay area would be great but not necessary. Thanks, Jonathan -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From agah at vt.edu Tue Jul 11 11:50:00 2023 From: agah at vt.edu (Masoud Agah) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:50:00 -0400 Subject: [labnetwork] VAST Job Opps: Microfabrication-Process Engineers Message-ID: Job Opportunity Announcement Virginia Alliance for Semiconductor Technology (VAST) Microfabrication-Semiconductor Process Engineers Reporting to the VAST Associate Director of Operations, the VAST Microfabrication - Semiconductor Process Engineers will be located at VAST Headquarter in Arlington or one of the VAST partner institutions. VAST process engineers will: - Design and develop process flows and perform micro/nano fabrication or characterization for private and public entities in collaboration with the VAST management team - Work with facilities managers and staff across the alliance in Virginia to develop virtual training modules to VAST-standards - Travel across the Commonwealth of Virginia as needed to perform assigned tasks within the cleanroom and material characterization facilities - Be responsible for creating hands-on training modules for different workforce development programs - Train veterans, adult learners, and other stakeholders as instructed within the VAST facilities and execute the Fast Track to Semiconductor Careers and other workforce programs - Generate and provide data as needed to be integrated within the VAST cloud-based facilities management system - Implement the unified VAST multimedia documentation for safety training, tool training, site-specific policies, and recipe repository - Work with core groups to create an inventory of semiconductor and nanotechnology tools and equipment within the VAST nodes and beyond in the Commonwealth of Virginia - Gather information and prepare reports as instructed related to the use of the facilities and workforce training programs - Work closely with faculty, students, and staff at partner universities to meet the needs and goals set by the VAST leadership team Potential candidates need to pay particular attention to the primary location of the opportunity when applying for this position. Primary Location: Virginia Tech Node in Blacksburg, VA (Job No: 526285) Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, VA (Job No: 562286) Norfolk State University Node in Norfolk, VA (Job No: 562287) University of Virginia Node in Charlottesville (Job No: 526288) Careers at Virginia Tech careers.pageuppeople.com ? 2 min read Masoud Agah Founding Director, Virginia Alliance for Semiconductor Technology (VAST) Virginia Microelectronics Consortium (VMEC) Professor of Engineering > The Bradley Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering > Mechanical Engineering Department (Affiliate) > Faculty Senate and University Council Member Virginia Tech Voice: (540) 231-2653 VT MEMS Lab -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From nzxie at uw.edu Fri Jul 14 19:08:20 2023 From: nzxie at uw.edu (Ningzhi Xie) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:08:20 -0700 Subject: [labnetwork] Dicing sapphire wafer Message-ID: Dear College, I am using the DISCO DAD 321 Wafer Dicing Saw and VT07 SD400 blade to dice a 460?m sapphire (Al2O3) wafer. It seems the wafer is too hard that I get into trouble of frequently breaking the dicing blade. I have tried lowing the spin speed to 12000rpm, the cutting speed to 1mm/s, and only cut into half of the wafer (230?m) but still got the blade broken. I am wondering if you have any good suggestions on sapphire wafer dicing. Thank you very much. Best regards, Ningzhi Xie Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Washington -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jdeng at cns.fas.harvard.edu Fri Jul 14 21:05:58 2023 From: jdeng at cns.fas.harvard.edu (Deng, Jiangdong) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 01:05:58 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Dicing sapphire wafer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2EF2CE86-A2E7-4D73-9EFB-87B8B2DE66E2@cns.fas.harvard.edu> 1mm/s is too fast for sapphire. Typically we use 0.1 or 0.2 mm/s and 20k RPM. Blade thickness should be 0.3 mm ( no thinner than 0.2 mm). Please also check the disco service, and they usually will give you very good suggestions. -JD @ CNS of Harvard Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 14, 2023, at 7:55 PM, Ningzhi Xie wrote: > > ? > Dear College, > > I am using the DISCO DAD 321 Wafer Dicing Saw and VT07 SD400 blade to dice a 460?m sapphire (Al2O3) wafer. It seems the wafer is too hard that I get into trouble of frequently breaking the dicing blade. I have tried lowing the spin speed to 12000rpm, the cutting speed to 1mm/s, and only cut into half of the wafer (230?m) but still got the blade broken. I am wondering if you have any good suggestions on sapphire wafer dicing. > > Thank you very much. > > Best regards, > Ningzhi Xie > Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering > University of Washington > _______________________________________________ > labnetwork mailing list > labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu > https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork From demis at ucsb.edu Fri Jul 14 21:50:45 2023 From: demis at ucsb.edu (Demis D. John) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:50:45 -0700 Subject: [labnetwork] Dicing sapphire wafer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We commonly have that issue with thick (?400?m) sapphire. Even with good water jet cooling (critical to check that alignment), large grit blades (or the vitreous blades you're using), and slow cut speeds - the blades still break every ~8-15 cuts (we got this many cuts per blade with various experimentation). Disco did say those vitreous blades are supposed to last longer than resnoid, but we didn't have enough demo blades to really test it out efficiently, and didn't yet find parameters where they are outlasting our resnoid blades. A common solution include half-cutting the wafer (going only halfway into the wafer), then full-cutting the wafer on a separate pass. We still have to set the program to check the blade every 1-2 cuts, as it wears and breaks eventually, and it takes a *very* long time to complete the wafer in this way, so we just do full-cutting and change blades when it wears down too much (via automatic checking on our ADT) - it was actually faster this way for us, but I guess it potentially consumes the resnoid blades faster. -- Demis (contact info ) *Reminder*: The NanoFab has a publications policy On Fri, Jul 14, 2023 at 4:57?PM Ningzhi Xie wrote: > Dear College, > > I am using the DISCO DAD 321 Wafer Dicing Saw and VT07 SD400 blade to dice > a 460?m sapphire (Al2O3) wafer. It seems the wafer is too hard that I get > into trouble of frequently breaking the dicing blade. I have tried lowing > the spin speed to 12000rpm, the cutting speed to 1mm/s, and only cut into > half of the wafer (230?m) but still got the blade broken. I am wondering if > you have any good suggestions on sapphire wafer dicing. > > Thank you very much. > > Best regards, > Ningzhi Xie > Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering > University of Washington > _______________________________________________ > labnetwork mailing list > labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu > https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From christophe.clement at polymtl.ca Sat Jul 15 06:43:54 2023 From: christophe.clement at polymtl.ca (Christophe =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?=) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2023 06:43:54 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [labnetwork] Dicing sapphire wafer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1298238230.16280351.1689417834636.JavaMail.zimbra@polymtl.ca> Hi Ningzhi We dice sapphire wafer at Poly using a resinoid blade, grit size of 45 microns minimum (sometime 75 microns), cutting speed lower than your at 0.4 mm/s, spindle speed at 22 KRPM and we don't have issue. Sample thickness is the same as yours, and we cut it in one pass. Hope this help Best Chris Christophe Cl?ment Technicien laboratoire Laboratoire de microfabrication (LMF) Groupe des Couches Minces (GCM) [ http://www.gcmlab.ca/ | www.gcmlab.ca ] Ecole Polytechnique de Montr?al [ http://www.polymtl.ca/ | www.polymtl.ca ] D?partement de g?nie physique * 2900 Boulevard Edouard Monpetit Pavillon JAB Campus de l'Universit? de Montr?al Montr?al (Qu?bec) H3T 1J4 8 [ mailto:christophe.clement at polymtl.ca | christophe.clement at polymtl.ca ] ( 514 340 4711 #2417 Fax : 514 340 5195 De: "Ningzhi Xie" ?: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Envoy?: Vendredi 14 Juillet 2023 19:08:20 Objet: [labnetwork] Dicing sapphire wafer Dear College, I am using the DISCO DAD 321 Wafer Dicing Saw and VT07 SD400 blade to dice a 460?m sapphire (Al2O3) wafer. It seems the wafer is too hard that I get into trouble of frequently breaking the dicing blade. I have tried lowing the spin speed to 12000rpm, the cutting speed to 1mm/s, and only cut into half of the wafer (230?m) but still got the blade broken. I am wondering if you have any good suggestions on sapphire wafer dicing. Thank you very much. Best regards, Ningzhi Xie Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Washington _______________________________________________ labnetwork mailing list labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From v.r.adineh at gmail.com Sun Jul 16 20:51:46 2023 From: v.r.adineh at gmail.com (Vahid R. Adineh) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 10:51:46 +1000 Subject: [labnetwork] Dicing sapphire wafer In-Reply-To: <2EF2CE86-A2E7-4D73-9EFB-87B8B2DE66E2@cns.fas.harvard.edu> References: <2EF2CE86-A2E7-4D73-9EFB-87B8B2DE66E2@cns.fas.harvard.edu> Message-ID: Dear Ningzhi, Regarding your inquiry about sapphire cutting, our current practice involves setting a depth of <0.2mm per cut (e.g., 3-pass cuts for a 0.5mm thickness sapphire wafer) with a spindle revolution of 15K and a cutting speed of 1 mm/s. To minimise blade vibrations, we utilise blades with smaller outer diameters, specifically the P1A851 SDC320R10MB01 (52x0.3x40) for sapphire wafers. We are currently equipped with the DAD3350, which incorporates automatic blade dressing. However, in the past, when using the DAD321, we were performing manual blade dressing after every 5 cuts. This involved unloading the sapphire wafer after 5 cuts, performing the blade dressing on a dressing board installed on a separate tape, reloading the sapphire wafer, and then resuming the dicing process. I hope this information proves helpful to you. Thank you, Vahid On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 10:42?PM Deng, Jiangdong wrote: > 1mm/s is too fast for sapphire. Typically we use 0.1 or 0.2 mm/s and 20k > RPM. Blade thickness should be 0.3 mm ( no thinner than 0.2 mm). Please > also check the disco service, and they usually will give you very good > suggestions. > > -JD @ CNS of Harvard > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Jul 14, 2023, at 7:55 PM, Ningzhi Xie wrote: > > > > ? > > Dear College, > > > > I am using the DISCO DAD 321 Wafer Dicing Saw and VT07 SD400 blade to > dice a 460?m sapphire (Al2O3) wafer. It seems the wafer is too hard that I > get into trouble of frequently breaking the dicing blade. I have tried > lowing the spin speed to 12000rpm, the cutting speed to 1mm/s, and only cut > into half of the wafer (230?m) but still got the blade broken. I am > wondering if you have any good suggestions on sapphire wafer dicing. > > > > Thank you very much. > > > > Best regards, > > Ningzhi Xie > > Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering > > University of Washington > > _______________________________________________ > > labnetwork mailing list > > labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu > > https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork > _______________________________________________ > labnetwork mailing list > labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu > https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hollingshead.19 at osu.edu Mon Jul 17 10:58:39 2023 From: hollingshead.19 at osu.edu (Hollingshead, Dave) Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 14:58:39 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Dicing sapphire wafer In-Reply-To: References: <2EF2CE86-A2E7-4D73-9EFB-87B8B2DE66E2@cns.fas.harvard.edu> Message-ID: Hi Ningzhi, We dice sapphire quite a bit. Our dicing owner had the following comments (we have an ADT 7122): We have had good luck dicing sapphire with the following recipe: Feed rate = 1mm/sec Spindle Speed = 18krpm Cut depth = 200um/pass. I have not had great luck with Disco resin blades for dicing sapphire. We typically use ADT or Asahi resin blades. A couple questions: What is the OD of the blade? Is the spray water positioned correctly on the blade as it is cutting? (not enough cooling, too much heat = increased blade load and wear) Is the substrate round or rectangular? Substrate diameter/dimensions? How far outside the substate edge does the blade begin the cutting process? (typical is 10mm) -Dave Dave Hollingshead Manager, Research Operations The Ohio State University Nanotech West Labs Suite 100, 1381 Kinnear Rd, Columbus, OH 43212 614.292.1355 Office hollingshead.19 at osu.edu / nanotech.osu.edu Pronouns: he/him/his From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Vahid R. Adineh Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2023 20:52 To: Ningzhi Xie Cc: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Dicing sapphire wafer Dear Ningzhi, Regarding your inquiry about sapphire cutting, our current practice involves setting a depth of <0.?2mm per cut (e.?g.?, 3-pass cuts for a 0.?5mm thickness sapphire wafer) with a spindle revolution of 15K and a cutting speed of Dear Ningzhi, Regarding your inquiry about sapphire cutting, our current practice involves setting a depth of <0.2mm per cut (e.g., 3-pass cuts for a 0.5mm thickness sapphire wafer) with a spindle revolution of 15K and a cutting speed of 1 mm/s. To minimise blade vibrations, we utilise blades with smaller outer diameters, specifically the P1A851 SDC320R10MB01 (52x0.3x40) for sapphire wafers. We are currently equipped with the DAD3350, which incorporates automatic blade dressing. However, in the past, when using the DAD321, we were performing manual blade dressing after every 5 cuts. This involved unloading the sapphire wafer after 5 cuts, performing the blade dressing on a dressing board installed on a separate tape, reloading the sapphire wafer, and then resuming the dicing process. I hope this information proves helpful to you. Thank you, Vahid On Sat, Jul 15, 2023 at 10:42?PM Deng, Jiangdong > wrote: 1mm/s is too fast for sapphire. Typically we use 0.1 or 0.2 mm/s and 20k RPM. Blade thickness should be 0.3 mm ( no thinner than 0.2 mm). Please also check the disco service, and they usually will give you very good suggestions. -JD @ CNS of Harvard Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 14, 2023, at 7:55 PM, Ningzhi Xie > wrote: > > ? > Dear College, > > I am using the DISCO DAD 321 Wafer Dicing Saw and VT07 SD400 blade to dice a 460?m sapphire (Al2O3) wafer. It seems the wafer is too hard that I get into trouble of frequently breaking the dicing blade. I have tried lowing the spin speed to 12000rpm, the cutting speed to 1mm/s, and only cut into half of the wafer (230?m) but still got the blade broken. I am wondering if you have any good suggestions on sapphire wafer dicing. > > Thank you very much. > > Best regards, > Ningzhi Xie > Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering > University of Washington > _______________________________________________ > labnetwork mailing list > labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu > https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork _______________________________________________ labnetwork mailing list labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From hathaway at cns.fas.harvard.edu Tue Jul 18 17:51:55 2023 From: hathaway at cns.fas.harvard.edu (Hathaway, Malcolm R) Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2023 21:51:55 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] TTIP Cylinder Overheated - Request for Advise Message-ID: Hey all, We (not CNS, but another lab) have an issue with a TTIP cylinder (Cambridge Nano/swagelok-style) which got over-heated to an unknown temp, whereupon the bottle acquired a bulge. It was closed at the time, and so is still under pressure to an unknown degree. The bottle label melted, for reference. Questions: Are the contents likely to be decomposition products? Would these products be flammable or explosive? Can a bottle burst under the flexural stress of slow depressurization? Is there a safe way to depressurize? We came up with the idea of attaching a second valve (these are all VCR), and alternating opening inner valve (then closing) and opening outer valve (then closing), to step-wise vent the bottle. Has anyone heard of such a technique causing the bottle to burst along the way? Suggestion welcome. Mac -- Mac Hathaway Senior Process and Systems Engineer Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems 11 Oxford St. Cambridge, MA 02138 617-495-9012 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From s.etienne at ucl.ac.uk Wed Jul 19 04:29:09 2023 From: s.etienne at ucl.ac.uk (Etienne, Steve) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2023 08:29:09 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Job opportunity in London Message-ID: Hi everyone, I'd like to make you aware of this position available at UCL. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/work-at-ucl/search-ucl-jobs/details?jobId=12592&jobTitle=Cleanroom+Manager Best Regards Steve Stephen Etienne | Cleanroom Manager I retire at end of July 2023, and my current email will become inactive. Please use lcn.crteam at ucl.ac.uk for ongoing communications. London Centre for Nanotechnology | UCL | 17-19 Gordon Street | London | WC1H 0AH Tel: +44 (0)207 679 2570 | www.london-nano.com lcn.crteam at ucl.ac.uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From deonc69 at illinois.edu Thu Jul 20 14:55:00 2023 From: deonc69 at illinois.edu (Collins, Deon) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 18:55:00 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] TTIP Cylinder Overheated - Request for Advise In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I would have the bottle disposed of ASAP. The structural integrity of the cylinder has been compromised. Deon D. Collins FACILITY MANAGER The Grainger College Of Engineering UIUC Holonyak Micro & Nanotechnology Lab 208 N Wright St Rm. 1114 | MC-249 Urbana, IL 61801 217-300-7531 | deonc69 at illinois.edu [cid:image001.png at 01D9BB11.CB783070] Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act any written communication to or from university employees regarding university business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure. Life is not about watching other people live it. It's about you living your own! From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Hathaway, Malcolm R Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 4:52 PM To: Labnetwork Mailing List Subject: [labnetwork] TTIP Cylinder Overheated - Request for Advise Hey all, We (not CNS, but another lab) have an issue with a TTIP cylinder (Cambridge Nano/swagelok-style) which got over-heated to an unknown temp, whereupon the bottle acquired a bulge. It was closed at the time, and so is still under pressure to an unknown degree. The bottle label melted, for reference. Questions: Are the contents likely to be decomposition products? Would these products be flammable or explosive? Can a bottle burst under the flexural stress of slow depressurization? Is there a safe way to depressurize? We came up with the idea of attaching a second valve (these are all VCR), and alternating opening inner valve (then closing) and opening outer valve (then closing), to step-wise vent the bottle. Has anyone heard of such a technique causing the bottle to burst along the way? Suggestion welcome. Mac -- Mac Hathaway Senior Process and Systems Engineer Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems 11 Oxford St. Cambridge, MA 02138 617-495-9012 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 2602 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From hathaway at cns.fas.harvard.edu Thu Jul 20 17:17:56 2023 From: hathaway at cns.fas.harvard.edu (Hathaway, Malcolm R) Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2023 21:17:56 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] TTIP Cylinder Overheated - Request for Advise In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hello All, Thanks for all the good comments and suggestions. As several of you (and our own EHS) suggested, we have entrusted the cylinder to our toxic waste removal company. We are still a bit leery of sending out a potentially pressurized cylinder (albeit a small one) to be disposed of by possibly rough methods, but that is what was recommended. If we hear any additional news about it's final disposition, I'll be sure to let everyone know. Again, thanks for all the help and good recommendations. Mac Hathaway Harvard CNS ________________________________ From: Collins, Deon Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2023 2:55 PM To: Hathaway, Malcolm R ; Labnetwork Mailing List Subject: RE: TTIP Cylinder Overheated - Request for Advise I would have the bottle disposed of ASAP. The structural integrity of the cylinder has been compromised. Deon D. Collins FACILITY MANAGER The Grainger College Of Engineering UIUC Holonyak Micro & Nanotechnology Lab 208 N Wright St Rm. 1114 | MC-249 Urbana, IL 61801 217-300-7531 | deonc69 at illinois.edu [cid:image001.png at 01D9BB11.CB783070] Under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act any written communication to or from university employees regarding university business is a public record and may be subject to public disclosure. Life is not about watching other people live it. It?s about you living your own! From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Hathaway, Malcolm R Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2023 4:52 PM To: Labnetwork Mailing List Subject: [labnetwork] TTIP Cylinder Overheated - Request for Advise Hey all, We (not CNS, but another lab) have an issue with a TTIP cylinder (Cambridge Nano/swagelok-style) which got over-heated to an unknown temp, whereupon the bottle acquired a bulge. It was closed at the time, and so is still under pressure to an unknown degree. The bottle label melted, for reference. Questions: Are the contents likely to be decomposition products? Would these products be flammable or explosive? Can a bottle burst under the flexural stress of slow depressurization? Is there a safe way to depressurize? We came up with the idea of attaching a second valve (these are all VCR), and alternating opening inner valve (then closing) and opening outer valve (then closing), to step-wise vent the bottle. Has anyone heard of such a technique causing the bottle to burst along the way? Suggestion welcome. Mac -- Mac Hathaway Senior Process and Systems Engineer Harvard Center for Nanoscale Systems 11 Oxford St. Cambridge, MA 02138 617-495-9012 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.png Type: image/png Size: 2602 bytes Desc: image001.png URL: From manuel.lozano at csic.es Mon Jul 24 06:37:58 2023 From: manuel.lozano at csic.es (Manuel Lozano) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 12:37:58 +0200 Subject: [labnetwork] SiC wafers processed in AMI P500 Message-ID: Dear Colleagues, we have an old Applied Materials P500 LPCVD that we use for SiO2 deposition. The robotic arm is intended for 6 inches wafers. We have been using it with 4 inches SiC wafers for many years using a pocket wafer, we etched a 4 inches pocket on a 6 inches Si wafer, and that worked perfectly. We have now moved to 6 inches SiC wafers, therefore we do not need the pocket wafer more. Nevertheless, when we tried to process the wafers directly we discovered that the robotic arm does not recognize the presence of the wafer, as SiC is transparent, and refuses to load them. We tried using different materials deposited in the backside to make the wafer opaque (resist, metal, polysilicon), but the result is not satisfactory as the quality of the surface is degraded. The equipment is very old and it is not longer maintained by AMI, so we can not ask for reprogramming? the robot software. Does any of you have experience with processing transparent wafer with robotic arms? Do you foresee any solution? We will appreciate any suggestion Best regards Manuel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Manuel Lozano Centro Nacional de Microelectronica IMB-CNM (CSIC) Campus UAB, C/ Til?lers, s/n 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain tel.: +34 93 594 77 00 ext. 2120 email: manuel.lozano at csic.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From Peter.Lomax at ed.ac.uk Mon Jul 24 09:00:53 2023 From: Peter.Lomax at ed.ac.uk (Peter Lomax) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 13:00:53 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] SiC wafers processed in AMI P500 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, On our STS PECVD for transparent material we have to cheat and put a piece of tin foil over the sensor. Best Peter -----Original Message----- From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Manuel Lozano Sent: 24 July 2023 11:38 To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Subject: [labnetwork] SiC wafers processed in AMI P500 This email was sent to you by someone outside the University. You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe. Dear Colleagues, we have an old Applied Materials P500 LPCVD that we use for SiO2 deposition. The robotic arm is intended for 6 inches wafers. We have been using it with 4 inches SiC wafers for many years using a pocket wafer, we etched a 4 inches pocket on a 6 inches Si wafer, and that worked perfectly. We have now moved to 6 inches SiC wafers, therefore we do not need the pocket wafer more. Nevertheless, when we tried to process the wafers directly we discovered that the robotic arm does not recognize the presence of the wafer, as SiC is transparent, and refuses to load them. We tried using different materials deposited in the backside to make the wafer opaque (resist, metal, polysilicon), but the result is not satisfactory as the quality of the surface is degraded. The equipment is very old and it is not longer maintained by AMI, so we can not ask for reprogramming the robot software. Does any of you have experience with processing transparent wafer with robotic arms? Do you foresee any solution? We will appreciate any suggestion Best regards Manuel ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Prof. Manuel Lozano Centro Nacional de Microelectronica IMB-CNM (CSIC) Campus UAB, C/ Til?lers, s/n 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain tel.: +34 93 594 77 00 ext. 2120 email: manuel.lozano at csic.es ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ labnetwork mailing list labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th? ann an Oilthigh Dh?n ?ideann, cl?raichte an Alba, ?ireamh cl?raidh SC005336. From vk409 at soe.rutgers.edu Mon Jul 24 13:12:18 2023 From: vk409 at soe.rutgers.edu (Vibhor Kumar) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:12:18 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Sparkles in the PECVD deposited amorphous silicon film Message-ID: Dear labnetwork community, We are trying to deposit a-si (~100 nm) with plasmatherm PECVD. We are using 10% silane. Our recipe worked fine in the past. But this time we started looking some "sparkles" in the deposited film (image attached). We cleaned the chamber with freon gas, but still the situation is the same. Any suggestion/s will be highly appreciated. Sincerely, -Vibhor Kumar- Research Associate, School of Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, NJ USA. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: amorphous silicon.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2842221 bytes Desc: amorphous silicon.jpg URL: From clark at cnf.cornell.edu Mon Jul 24 18:35:35 2023 From: clark at cnf.cornell.edu (Jeremy Clark) Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 18:35:35 -0400 Subject: [labnetwork] Sparkles in the PECVD deposited amorphous silicon film In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8f205bc8-af15-d8b2-8d8e-820fd7a170ca@cnf.cornell.edu> Hi Vibhor, You should look under a microscope but these look like bubbles- either from poor adhesion or too much Hydrogen in the film (or both). How did you clean your sample before deposition? What is the underlying material, and is it possible it has changed? Is possible that some part of the tool was changed recently? Regards, Jeremy Clark Cornell Nanoscale Facility On 7/24/23 13:12, Vibhor Kumar wrote: > Dear labnetwork community, > We are trying to deposit a-si (~100 nm) with plasmatherm PECVD. We are > using 10% silane. Our recipe worked fine in the past. But this time we > started looking some "sparkles" in the deposited film (image > attached). We cleaned the chamber with freon gas, but still the > situation is the same. > > Any suggestion/s will be highly appreciated. > > Sincerely, > -Vibhor Kumar- > Research Associate, > School of Engineering, > Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, NJ > USA. > > _______________________________________________ > labnetwork mailing list > labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu > https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From odc1n08 at soton.ac.uk Tue Jul 25 03:00:48 2023 From: odc1n08 at soton.ac.uk (Owain Clark) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 07:00:48 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Sparkles in the PECVD deposited amorphous silicon film In-Reply-To: <8f205bc8-af15-d8b2-8d8e-820fd7a170ca@cnf.cornell.edu> References: <8f205bc8-af15-d8b2-8d8e-820fd7a170ca@cnf.cornell.edu> Message-ID: Looks like compressive stress. Improve the sample pre-cleaning as suggested or try depositing onto SiO2 and the adhesion should improve. O. From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Jeremy Clark Sent: 24 July 2023 23:36 To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Subject: Re: [labnetwork] Sparkles in the PECVD deposited amorphous silicon film CAUTION: This e-mail originated outside the University of Southampton. Hi Vibhor, You should look under a microscope but these look like bubbles- either from poor adhesion or too much Hydrogen in the film (or both). How did you clean your sample before deposition? What is the underlying material, and is it possible it has changed? Is possible that some part of the tool was changed recently? Regards, Jeremy Clark Cornell Nanoscale Facility On 7/24/23 13:12, Vibhor Kumar wrote: Dear labnetwork community, We are trying to deposit a-si (~100 nm) with plasmatherm PECVD. We are using 10% silane. Our recipe worked fine in the past. But this time we started looking some "sparkles" in the deposited film (image attached). We cleaned the chamber with freon gas, but still the situation is the same. Any suggestion/s will be highly appreciated. Sincerely, -Vibhor Kumar- Research Associate, School of Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, NJ USA. _______________________________________________ labnetwork mailing list labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu https://mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Peter.Lomax at ed.ac.uk Tue Jul 25 04:36:59 2023 From: Peter.Lomax at ed.ac.uk (Peter Lomax) Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 08:36:59 +0000 Subject: [labnetwork] Sparkles in the PECVD deposited amorphous silicon film In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We add Argon to our recipe - can check the details if of interest. Best Peter From: labnetwork On Behalf Of Vibhor Kumar Sent: 24 July 2023 18:12 To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu Subject: [labnetwork] Sparkles in the PECVD deposited amorphous silicon film This email was sent to you by someone outside the University. You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email is genuine and the content is safe. Dear labnetwork community, We are trying to deposit a-si (~100 nm) with plasmatherm PECVD. We are using 10% silane. Our recipe worked fine in the past. But this time we started looking some "sparkles" in the deposited film (image attached). We cleaned the chamber with freon gas, but still the situation is the same. Any suggestion/s will be highly appreciated. Sincerely, -Vibhor Kumar- Research Associate, School of Engineering, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, NJ USA. The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th' ann an Oilthigh Dh?n ?ideann, cl?raichte an Alba, ?ireamh cl?raidh SC005336. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danielboyd499 at yahoo.com Wed Jul 26 11:09:01 2023 From: danielboyd499 at yahoo.com (Daniel Boyd) Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2023 11:09:01 -0400 Subject: [labnetwork] JEOL JSM-5800LV Repair Help Needed Message-ID: <911963863.843698.1690384275452@yahoo.com> I am an undergraduate research student at Anderson University in South Carolina US and I am working on repairing a JEOL JSM-5800LV. The SEM was donated from FUJI Films lab and was operational just a few years ago and was replaced with a new system. The guy that picked up the machine cut all of the wires between the control unit and the microscope unit instead of unplugging cords and now I am trying to wire it back together. Most cables were labeled but many lost their labels in the moving process. I also was never given the key to start the machine making it very difficult to troubleshoot. I have tried looking online to buy a replacement but the model is so old I can not find it anywhere. If anyone could help me find a replacement key or perhaps have an old key to the same machine that I could copy that would be enormously helpful. Also any suggestions on how to repair the wires would be helpful. If someone has experience with the machine I can send some pictures if that would be helpful. Any advice or suggestions would be very appreciated. Sent from Mail for Windows -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rober074 at umn.edu Thu Jul 27 10:54:09 2023 From: rober074 at umn.edu (Kevin Roberts) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 09:54:09 -0500 Subject: [labnetwork] Frontier Semiconductor FSM laser replacement Message-ID: Hello, We have a 1998 FSM 900tc-vac stress measurement system. Its 750 nm laser diode died recently, and its 810 nm laser diode died years ago. I'd very much like to repair it however, and keep using it, as it is very versatile, and something of a Cadillac model. I was told years ago that if the last laser died, then we'd have to consider the machine's life over, but I don't recall the details as to 'why'. Has anyone ever replaced their laser diodes on a vintage FSM, and were you successful in getting it to work again? Also, does anyone have a good service person's contact at FSM? It's been like 20 years since I've talked to service there, and I'm not sure who to run my question by. Thanks so much. Regards, Kevin -- Kevin Roberts Staff Scientist Minnesota Nano Center University of Minnesota 140 Physics & Nanotechnology Bldg. 115 Union St. SE Minneapolis, MN 55455 rober074 at umn.edu 612-624-7092 direct 612-625-5012 fax http://www.mnc.umn.edu -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: