[labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

[Bob Henderson]

Mac:

 

I think that is a wonderful idea. As I am more involved in various equipment
and process technologies, it would be a good opportunity to help with more
specific issues regarding advancements and new equipment available for a
variety of nano specific questions and projects. Bob Henderson

 

From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu]
On Behalf Of Mac Hathaway
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 6:56 AM
To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
Subject: [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

 

Hey All,

As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust of
Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation and
administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow interest), I'm
guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't ask certain question, out
of deference to others...

If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list, for
instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment", where much more
specific questions can be aired without guilt(!), such as "Has anyone seen a
difference between 5x9s purity and 98% purity TMA in their ALD aluminum
oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's fine as it is?  I'm thinking a specific
process or equipment list might bring in other folks for whom the general
questions have not been sufficiently relevant to merit their attention. 

Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...


Mac Hathaway
Harvard CNS

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140702/ead06028/attachment.html>