[labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?

Vicky Diadiuk diadiuk at MIT.EDU
Thu Jul 3 08:11:18 EDT 2014


HI,
 I respectfully but COMPLETELY disagree.
MIT (Prof Duane Boning to be precise) has been moderating Labnetwork for years & it's working beautifully.
The information one gleans (even if one wasn't explicitly interested before it got asked) is most useful, & participants seem to be pretty relaxed asking specific questions.
If the thread gets too detailed, it switches seamlessly to a conversation between the parties.
I don't think we need to make rather artificial process, equipment & operations distinctions.

If ain't broke ...

 Happy 4th!
Vicky


 
On Jul 2, 2014, at 11:30 AM, Bob Henderson wrote:

> Mac:
>  
> I think that is a wonderful idea. As I am more involved in various equipment and process technologies, it would be a good opportunity to help with more specific issues regarding advancements and new equipment available for a variety of nano specific questions and projects. Bob Henderson
>  
> From: labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu [mailto:labnetwork-bounces at mtl.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Mac Hathaway
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2014 6:56 AM
> To: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> Subject: [labnetwork] Labnetwork - Process?
>  
> Hey All,
> 
> As there is still occasional uncertainty regarding the main thrust of Labnetwork (i.e. general questions about cleanroom operation and administration vs. more specific questions of more narrow interest), I'm guessing that some Labnetworkers sometimes don't ask certain question, out of deference to others...
> 
> If this is the case, does it make sense to create a parallel list, for instance "Labnetwork - Process" or "Labnetwork - Equipment", where much more specific questions can be aired without guilt(!), such as "Has anyone seen a difference between 5x9s purity and 98% purity TMA in their ALD aluminum oxide?"  Or do folks feel it's fine as it is?  I'm thinking a specific process or equipment list might bring in other folks for whom the general questions have not been sufficiently relevant to merit their attention. 
> 
> Just a thought that came up during the UGIM...
> 
> 
> Mac Hathaway
> Harvard CNS
> _______________________________________________
> labnetwork mailing list
> labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu
> https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140703/9f934ac0/attachment.html>


More information about the labnetwork mailing list