[labnetwork] Benchmarking Survey
Anson, Susan (STN)
susan.anson at kit.edu
Tue Jul 29 03:09:37 EDT 2014
Dear Rosie,
Thanks for putting me on cc. As you know here at Karlsruhe we have made a start on a benchmarking study on nanofabrication facilities (also with you). We are mainly interested in the operational model of the infrastructure (free access via peer review vs paid access), the output both in terms of the classical performance indicators (publications etc.) as well as the relation between technologies, application areas , and the in-house research of the host infrastructures. We see this as a way of measuring the impact in terms of innovative relevance – a hot topic here in Europe.
This is the link to our home nfrastructure Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF) http://www.knmf.kit.edu/ , and the European Network I coordinated – at the moment we are preparing a proposal for a follow on, www.euminafab.eu<http://www.euminafab.eu/> .
A global approach to the benchmarking would be really good, I would be very interested to discuss further with you and Thomas,
Best regards,
Susan
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Helmholtz Programme Science and Technology of Nanosystems (STN)
Karlsruhe Nano Micro Facility (KNMF)
Dr. Susan Anson
Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1
76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 721 608 2 8103
Mobile +49 (0) 175 5735 149
Fax: +49 (0) 721 608 2 5579
Email: susan.anson at kit.edu<mailto:susan.anson at kit.edu>
http://www.stn.kit.edu/
http://www.knmf.kit.edu/
www.euminafab.eu<http://www.euminafab.eu/> (FP7-226460) EUMINAfab - your gateway to multimaterial micro nano fabrication
KIT – University of the State of Baden-Württemberg and National Large-scale Research Center of the Helmholtz Association
Von: rosie.hicks at gmail.com [mailto:rosie.hicks at gmail.com] Im Auftrag von rosie hicks
Gesendet: Dienstag, 29. Juli 2014 00:18
An: Ferraguto, Thomas
Cc: labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu; Anson, Susan (STN)
Betreff: Re: [labnetwork] Benchmarking Survey
Dear Thomas,
Great idea. We need to ensure we're comparing apples with apples, but I also think that we should start with the top ~10 questions.
I'd like to see something on the outputs from the facilities, for example, publications.
best wishes,
Rosie
On 26 July 2014 00:04, Ferraguto, Thomas <Thomas_Ferraguto at uml.edu<mailto:Thomas_Ferraguto at uml.edu>> wrote:
I am putting together a “Survey Monkey” anonymous Benchmarking Survey for our labs
What 10 questions would you like addressed
Examples…
Lab Size (square footage)
Staff Size
Average Staff Salary
Director Salary
Percentage of industrial users by account
Percentage of industrial user revenue
Total Annual Revenue
University Subsidy
$ spent on Service contracts
Thomas S. Ferraguto
Saab ETIC Nanofabrication Laboratory Director
University of Massachusetts Lowell
1 University Avenue
Lowell MA 01854-5120
978-934-1809<tel:978-934-1809> land
617-755-0910<tel:617-755-0910> mobile
978-934-1014<tel:978-934-1014> fax
[cid:image001.png at 01CFAB09.96B407F0]
_______________________________________________
labnetwork mailing list
labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu<mailto:labnetwork at mtl.mit.edu>
https://www-mtl.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo.cgi/labnetwork
--
Rosie Hicks
CEO - Australian National Fabrication Facility Ltd
www.anff.org.au<http://www.anff.org.au>
151 Wellington Road
Clayton
VIC 3168
03 9902 9618
0438 454 077
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140729/59f5a104/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 57965 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mtl.mit.edu/pipermail/labnetwork/attachments/20140729/59f5a104/attachment.png>
More information about the labnetwork
mailing list